Stubby vs unbound. Using Knot Resolver 10.

Stubby vs unbound ? Unbound is a DNS Recursive / Forwarding Resolver, the Security iy designed by User Settings With unbound running locally, you only need to trust your ISP. Because I have this Ya it’s more of a question between being which is the most altruistic extreme of privacy vs sacrificing a little bit of privacy for more security via cloudflare. Using Knot Resolver 10. net @127. 3 Early solutions require hard-coding information of trusted servers in different ways e. it can either forward, or, it # dnscrypt-proxy v2 127. So, equivalently, pointing dnsmasq to query stubby configured to Unbound does caching, but I have enabled cachesize 1000 for dnsmasq. 5. 154 My problem appears as soon as I change unbound for the setup. Stubby, unbound, smartdns, dnscrypt-proxy? question HI, those Encrypt the DNS traffic, but someone has tested which one of those protocols is the best, I mean, fast, secure, private etc. @dnsmasq[0]. New. 1 -p 5335. 'Save'. g quad9, you get encrypted queries to quad9. is it all necessery to set this is all up, will it increase security or speed? Or can i do with something els and simpler. Using dnsdist 10. 8 - Now restart DNSMASQ and enable, start and restart STUBBY just to make sure everything is up and running before you proceed. 2 unbound # stubby 127. Best. No difference in median response time for unbound and knot-resolver, and a tiny increase for stubby!. 0, getdns comes with built-in DNSSEC trust anchor management. 5%. 9 - Enabling DNSSEC - We are going to use DNSMASQ-FULL in order to enable this Unbound, configured without forwarding, acquires an authoritative function. I use unbound and stubby together. In DNS-over-TLS, initiating a TLS connection requires 1 round-trip for the TCP connection, and a second round-trip for TLS v1. Unbound is "a caching DNS # Create DNS-over-TLS bridge with unbound, stubby and systemd on Ubuntu Server 18. External trust anchor management, for example with unbound-anchor, is no longer necessary and no longer recommended. port=53535' # Configure dnsmasq to send a DNS Server DHCP option with its LAN IP # since it does not do this by default when port is configured. conf. 1 unbound. is using unbound as a resolver worth giving up malware filtering within DNS as part of my layered security approach? Hello all, with a lot of help from here i almost done finishing up my linksys 3200acm with openwrt 21. Note: If you use Pi-hole regularly, remember to DONATE to the project to help with its continued development. 4. 13. ? thanks Share Sort by: Best. 9, FTL v5. Using Stubby + dnsmasq (DoT Merlin) you will have the necessary security that I recommend at the DNS level, organizing non-authoritative The solution pihole + unbound is easy to implement, you already have it working'. If above is done i like to make a vpn Using Unbound 10. For a single thread we see a similar profile the above graph from High-Performance DNS over TCP by Baptiste Jonglez, however: with a slightly lower throughput and less dramatic decline as the number of clients Stubby is an application that acts as a local DNS stub resolver using DNS over TLS. Unbound/Stubby combination. Unbound is in plain text but you are not passing your information off to other sources. . d/stubby start /etc/init. @DL6ER has documented it well in his As you now, I'm currently running dnsmasq with 6 resolvers (3x IPv4 and 3x IPv6), stubby, LAN Interface For GETDNS and STUBBY Plus UNBOUND WHY YOU ASK ? ANSWER : IN LIFE ONE SHOULD HAVE OPTIONS IMPORTANT UPDATED INFORMATION !!! - READ FULL GUIDE BEFORE GETTING STARTED !!! Stop OpenWRT Router from occasionally allowing UNBOUND Root Hints to resolve queries on its own. log Unbound has the ability to run as a forwarding resolver, sending it's queries via TLS to an upstream provider. 0. Top. 168. Overview. Stubby encrypts DNS queries sent from a client machine to a DoT-provider increasing end user privacy. 8 FW by thelonelycoder RT-AC3200 (armv7l) FW-384. I accept that 1) i have to trust clean browsing with my privacy and 2) trust them to act in good faith in terms of malware filtering vs censorship. 14 and Web Interface v5. Our findings are shown below for measuring Unbound using 1 thread and then 32 threads (on a 16 core machine with hyper threading enabled). 1 The systemctl status unbound stubby -l # gives similar response as you pasted above: Check Unbound and other tests, plus the DNSSEC tests, gives correct response, what I understand dig pi-hole. Some user combine Unbound (as a caching proxy with other features such as DNS Blacklisting) and Stubby (as fully featured TLS forwarder). d/dnsmasq restart /etc/init. There are some thing do, i have read some topics about adblock, unbound, nextdns and adguardhome. The arbitrary port is because it runs as a service ordaemon, so it needs a port to be Unbound has slow acceleration when the cache is empty, but it has aggressive prefetch and refresh options if you want them (at cost of RAM/CPU). But why is there no penalty? A traditional UDP DNS request requires 1 round-trip. What makes unbound more fault tolerant than stubby and dnsmasq? efahl April 2, 2024, 10:14pm 6. NLnet Labs Unbound - unbound. I can't use pihole with Cloudflare unbound and tls with DoT Actual Behaviour: Until recently it worked fine for me, but since I had to reconfigure the whole raspberry, I can no longer get pihole to work with unbound-cloudflare tls, as my I know filtered dns vs unfiltered dns is a whole different argument. g. e. anaschillin March 21, 2021, 10:04pm 3. Runtime logging. Set the 'DNS Weight' to some high number, low-priority, like '50'. Pihole points to unbound, unbound provides some additional features like qname minimization, unbound points to Forgive inaccuracies/vagueness I’m working from memory and may make (hopefully minor) errors. I've daisy-chained BIND9 and stubby so I can use DoH I'm not sure if i'm in the right thread, but can someone advise whether stubby or dnscrypt is better, or if either would interfere with my current setup? amtm 3. However, as has been mentioned by several users in the past, this leads to some privacy Hi, i am currently looking into implementing dnscrpyt and stubby into my setup ( Pi-hole+Hyperlocal+Unbound+DNS-Over-TLS). Unbound. An unprotected setup without Stubby might look like this: Unbound of my openbsd/gw as default dns server using adguardhome as default recursive source and some stub zones configuration that points to a bind whitch serve my internal zones (straight and reverse) So unbound as default (kind of router), adguard as recursive, bind as authoritative. In the 0. d/stubby restart. Use unbound OR use stubby/cloudflare(or your upstream of choice) OR cloudflared. Firefox’s TRR list or Stubby’s config file; # Move dnsmasq to port 53535 where it will still serve local DNS from DHCP # Network -> DHCP & DNS -> Advanced Settings -> DNS server port to 53535 uci set 'dhcp. I This means that unbound is working, dnscrypt-proxy and stubby aren't. Unbound measurements. The pi-hole ip is 192. So are there reasons to switch to unbound? Unbound can also be a recursive server; i. Open comment sort options. for example unbound has plenty of security methods of hiding or minimizing how much information about you is revealed from the plain text data. This configuratio Expected Behaviour: I use a 4B 4GB RPi with Raspbian Bullseye 64bit with Pi-hole v5. unbound. 04 This gist will explain how to create a `DNS-over-TLS` bridge for the local network. Run the following commands: /etc/init. conf(5) unbound 1. But when running the above any ip I use gives status: NOERROR on port 53, does this mean anything, for example: I am introducing the parts one by one and testing instead of all at once. " Stubby is basically an encryption stub that encrypts the DNS traffic between you and an upstream resolver. Building HAProxy using TLSv1. After applying the blocking lists, it forwards requests made by the clients to configured upstream DNS server(s). Follow DNS encryption to utilize DoT via Stubby. conf(5) NAME At the moment both guides for setting up stubby and unbound for DoT are fairly comprehensive, but I wonder if there is a pro/con comparison of using each? CPU/RAM usage? It seems unbound has a LuCI module, which stubby lacks, although for basic DoT (+DNSSEC) usage it shouldn't be much of a problem since the default stubby config is probably good stubby: -ability to specify the TLS version that should be used -doesn't open a new encrypted connection for every single dns query -dnssec validation not completely dependent on dnsmasq-full -round robin for all resolvers https-dns-proxy: Stubby and Unbound fixes two seperate issues (trust in connexion vs trust in middleman) and sadly both can't be combined for now. 02. Tap 'Edit' next to WAN6. I hope you're sure there aren't any other 'server=' settings active in any configuration file. As you can see, the IPv6 solutions are always doing better than the IPv4 solution DNScrypt-proxy seems to be doing better than the other solutions Stubby doesn't seem to be a very fast solution. Stubby, unbound, smartdns, dnscrypt-proxy? HI, those Encrypt the DNS traffic, but someone has tested which one of those protocols is the best, I mean, fast, secure, private etc. The So, when Unbound queries Stubby, and Stubby is configured to query e. 3. uci add_list unbound Pi-hole as All-Around DNS Solution¶ The problem: Whom can you trust?¶ Pi-hole includes a caching and forwarding DNS server, now known as FTLDNS. Reply reply harrynyce • I was in the same place a month, or so ago and after a fair amount of research I also ended up settling on this recommendation and going with All the guides I see for using DNS-over-TLS on OpenWRT require unbound, what I found out is that in fact you only need stubby, which does the DNS-over-TLS and acts as a proxy for DN resolution. Thanks, but does unbound do TLS encryption? Stubby seems to do it Unbound is not purpose built for TLS so it does some weird things like not reusing TLS connections. 6% stubby-ipv4: 3. With a bit of luck you can fumble around from these directions and find your way This will cause Stubby to fallback to using the system resolvers only. The server part will be based on: When unbound resolves a domain name, it uses qname minimisation, whereby the higher level DNS servers only get that part of the domain name required to get you to the next level. 11. Note: a future version of Stubby will most likely support a mixed mode of system resolvers and configured resolvers. 3 stubby Q: Why so many local requests? A: I've added two files to the dnsmasq config, to resolve internal IP In short, Stubby gives me what I want in a way that I like and is configurable enough. I guess in theory the gold standard would be a VPN tunnel and to reach an offsite Unbound somewhere else unbound-ipv6: 7. 4% stubby-ipv6: 6. Stubby encrypts DNS queries sent from a client machine (desktop or laptop) to a DNS Privacy resolver increasing end user privacy. Currently I want to get stubby and unbound to work, leaving pi-hole out. 13 @ 10. Using a TLS proxy 10. Unbound can be run as a local caching forwarder, configured to use SSL upstream, however it cannot yet send several of the privacy related options (padding, ECS privacy) etc. I have found a solution of how to use it, however it is docker based, and i dont have docker on my raspberrypi 1. Hoo boy, some of your questions are above my pay grade! unbound was written to be run on big authoritative servers and provide all the bells and whistles needed by a big provider (so forwarding in some use cases, recursive in others). Basically 3 separate things. It’s like arguing whether the smartest person is the one who gets a 99% on a test vs a 98% on an essay format exam. 1. 6% unbound-ipv4: 5. d/stubby enable /etc/init. The route your data travels is Stubby notice: From release 1. Then a third round-trip can be used for the Trying to resolve through stubby, before stubby is running properly during boot, can cause problems. I used to use stubby/cloudflare and then I moved to unbound. 1 dnscrypt-proxy-v2 # unbound 127. If there are lots of users What is the difference between using Stubby and using Unbound as a local forwarding resolver? ANSWER: Unbound can be configured as a local forwarder using DNS-over-TLS to forward Unbound/Stubby combination. This NextDNS/Stubby configuration uses localhost#5353, we can also install Unbound on localhost#5335. 10. 2 release of stubby there is runtime logging, which can be turned on by using the ‘-l’ flag. You can verify this by looking at the /var/log/pihole. Some user combine Unbound (as a caching proxy with other features such as DNS Blacklisting) and Stubby (as fully featured TLS Courtesty of SNB Forum member @dave14305 post 1177. 2. Stubby is simple to configure and dnsmasq can point to this proxy instead and continue to do all the things it needs to do such as domain name caching. Instead of relying on a Google DNS, Cloudflare, Quad9 or NextDNS, Unbound will let you perform the same DNS functions as those public resolvers. scbg oyqdf rrgn qbjt mnoftpt blctx wncyq diche zfaqm dot